How do I make creativity my job?

Quite a few people have shared with me that they long for creativity to be their central, sustaining effort.  My sense is that folks are feeling transactional and burned out in their current employment.  Much of traditional work, and employer-employee relationships more generally, aren’t working for them.  They’re looking for something more balanced, respectful, human-centred, and well, creative.

But I’d suggest that ‘creativity as job’ might not be the only solution to this problem.

Creativity scholar Daniel Harris writes about the ways that creativity can be both “disembodied” (as structured, organized and even standardized), as well as “embodied,” as human-centred, imaginative, and emotional.  In today’s knowledge economy and political climate, where efficiencies and productivity drive the boat, the “disembodied” side of creativity and working generally have dominated.  The importance of creativity to address complex business and social problems is well trodden territory, alongside it’s cousin collaboration.  But what’s often forgotten, and what Harris advocates for, is a continued connection to creativity’s humanity- and arts-based roots.  My sense is that this is what people long for when they opine about making creativity their job.

However, as soon as you turn to discussing “something” becoming your “job” you are also talking about making money by sharing that something with someone for what they “need” or “desire.”  It is absolutely possible to make money while being creative (hello, Taylor Swift?).  Money is needed to sustain a decent and stable life – yes, that sounds completely obvious, but don’t discount the importance of this (what “a decent and stable life” looks like for you is distinct to your values, of course). 

I am not suggesting money is either “bad” or “good” – it is required.  But I would say that turning your creativity into a commodity has potential ramifications – specifically, that commerce and transactions can overtake, well, you; literally “selling” parts of yourself for other people’s uses and pleasures.  There is always the potential for this monetized relationship to move beyond sharing into trivializing and even exploiting, especially when there is very little money involved. 

How to address that problem?  

First, I’d encourage you to be practical about your everyday needs and how you can “professional-ize” your creative work.  It is possible to meet people’s needs and desires in stable and sustainable ways, and also guard your own humanity, which is the source of your creativity.  Set clear boundaries, develop healthy self-care practices, see your career as having stages and take breaks from your professionally creative work as you need to.  See your audience as an important long-term relationship, where money becomes part of the mix in your conversations and services.

Let me also add this nugget:

You don’t have to turn creativity into your job. 

If you desire more connection and less feeling like a cog, more wholeness and less like a piece of the transaction, more authentic collaboration and less defensiveness and concern about being thrown under the bus – you can develop your creativity outside of your paid-work, and frankly, even within your paid-work, in whatever small ways that are available to you.  And build a community of like-minded people who want to do this too.

Here are some ideas:
  • You can develop a regular creative practice just for the heck of it. 
  • You can see and nurture creativity in others. 
  • You can work in small creative or humanity-centred ways in your workplace, so others feel seen and connected (and likely this will come right back atcha!); if you are in a position to do so, you can shift broader, more formal work practices in these ways as well. 
  • You can pay and support professional artists, to ensure we all live in a creative and culturally-rich society – go see a show, buy that craft, share about it on social media.

Of course, we need good, creative workplace leadership here too.  If your leadership values those transactions and the bottom-line without balance, then your working life will be structured accordingly.  The need for humanity- and creativity-centred leadership is for another post!

This problem isn’t necessarily going to be completely solved by turning your creative practice into your job.  But it could be helped by building a world that is humanity- and creativity-centred, where decision-making and processes happen with structure, organization and standardization, as well as deep connections to our humanity.

Burnout is not an individual problem: it’s cultural

The way we think and talk about burnout needs to change. 

As individuals we feel it.  And we often think the solutions need to be individual too (more resilience training, anyone?).  But it will take a cultural shift to really address burnout, and create sustainable workplaces that are integrated and even connected parts within our lives.

I have been reading ‘The End of Burnout’ by Jonathan Malesic.  Part of what I am appreciating is how Malesic defines burnout as a disconnect between expectations of work (your own, or broader expectations of what you ‘should’ be getting out of working as your life’s purpose), and what the work is actually like.  He says this disconnect can lead to feelings of cynicism, disengagement, and general uselessness and disconnection.  He is a former academic, and left his job because of burnout. 

But a big part of what Malesic emphasizes is how the solution for burnout is usually discussed as taking place within individuals. 

Things like: how you need to reconnect with your passion for work, or the values of your work, or how you need to develop tools for resilience, or how you can practice self-care.  And, please don’t get me wrong here: when done for your personhood, not because you will be more “productive,” self-care can be a political act.  But what Malesic is saying is that this focus on individuals is mis-placed.  The solution needs to be collective.

Burnout is a cultural problem. 

Here’s an example. 

One of my besties sent me a text.  It reads: “I was commenting to a coworker this week “ok, so I’ve identified how I feel as burnout… now what? All the stuff I read is not helpful.  I can’t just “cut back on work” and “carve out more quiet time”… I feel like I need to just not do anything for like a year!” 

And then another: “I feel like I need something that’s “just a job” so I don’t care about it… but then how do I find the motivation to DO it for the majority of my waking life… ugh.

My friend has identified 2 things. 

  • Most burnout rhetoric is telling them they need to change themselves to avoid and navigate burnout.  Stuff like saying no to certain things at work, or carving out more personal “me” time.  But this isn’t helpful nor what they need.  What my friend suggests is that they need a complete break in order to recalibrate.  The current ways of doing things are just too much – they need a really, really long time away to even begin to feel balanced.
  • A possible solution could be getting “just a job” that they don’t care about.  Something they can go to and be paid for, but don’t have much investment in.  But this leaves them wondering how this will be sustainable in the long run, given work is where they spend the majority of their waking life.  With the “just a job” scenario, it’s possible there would be no connection.

But here’s the crux of the issue: we are assuming the solution needs to be individual. 

The problems are 1) the structures of work are not sustainable (granted my friend didn’t go into the details of what those structures are in their text), and all the suggested individual adaptations like carving out more “me time” or working to be resilient are not helpful, and 2) they seek some kind of meaning where they spend the greatest part of their day, even, or especially, if it’s not a grand life purpose.

An individual shouldn’t be changing their expectations around aspiring to have some kind of meaning or connection in their work, and to work in a sustainable way.  It should not be a radical thought to aspire for dignity. 

The problem is cultural, and so the solution needs to be collective. 

We need to re-think the place and meaning of work in our lives, and then we need to build different structures to reflect those values.